Rich People Are Better at Using AI, and It Has Nothing to Do with Prompt Engineering Skills

I Wrote 60 Original Articles in the Last 60 Days After Changing My Mindset

Artificial intelligence is changing how we code, write, and build things. Tools like ChatGPT have turned complex tasks into simple conversations. Anyone can draft an article, sketch out a product, or spin up an app in minutes.

This shift has introduced new trends—like "vibe coding," where devs work more intuitively and less logically, using AI as a creative partner instead of a compiler. But something else caught my attention: rich people are consistently better at using AI. Why?

You’d think the edge is in crafting smart prompts—saying stuff like “You are a Python expert” or “Act as a content strategist.” That was my first assumption, too. But after a lot of trial and error, I realized it’s not about prompts. It’s about iteration and mindset.

Wealthy people move faster, test ideas without hesitation, and treat failures like feedback. That’s the difference. Not secret tricks—just a way of working that lets them go further with the same tools.

People Overhyping Prompt Engineering

When ChatGPT first launched, everyone became obsessed with prompt engineering. Twitter threads, YouTube videos, and online courses promised that if you nailed the perfect prompt, you’d get perfect results.

I bought in hard. I enrolled in prompt courses—both free and paid—and learned every prompt formula and framework. I’d write hyper-specific commands like “You are a senior React developer. Build a full-featured e-commerce app,” and wait for greatness.

What I got instead was... mediocre. Code was buggy. Articles were cringe. Sometimes the output was just plain wrong.

So I tried longer prompts, clearer prompts, even “expert-approved” templates. Still bad. I thought I was doing something wrong.

Then I saw a developer on X build a beautiful app with ChatGPT. At first glance, it looked effortless—one perfect prompt, flawless result.

But when I looked closer, I noticed something: they weren’t a prompt wizard. They were an iteration machine. Dozens of small tweaks, constant feedback, and quick re-prompts.

That’s when it clicked. The trick isn’t to write one perfect prompt. It’s to write a lot of average ones and refine them fast.

Before AI, trying something new meant hours of coding and debugging. Now? You can try 10 approaches in 10 minutes. Prompt engineering didn’t fail me. Perfectionism did.

Why Rich People Are Better at Using AI

So why are rich people better at this?

It’s not IQ or access to better tools. Everyone has ChatGPT. What they have is a mindset.

They don’t fear wasting time or energy. They don’t hesitate to throw out bad outputs and try again. They move faster because they’re not scared of failure.

Say a founder wants a business plan. They write a rough prompt. It sucks. So they tweak it. Try again. Do that ten times and now they have something real. Each iteration teaches them something.

Now picture someone with a scarcity mindset. Every prompt feels high-stakes. If the AI spits out junk, they feel like they failed. That hesitation kills momentum.

I’ve been that person. I spent hours writing “perfect” prompts—then gave up when they didn’t work. I thought I was the problem. I wasn’t. I just wasn’t iterating enough.

The good news? You don’t need money to think like someone who has it. You just need to stop treating each prompt like a pass/fail test.

What Can We Do About It

Here’s what actually helped me.

Once I dropped the idea of perfect prompts, everything changed. I started iterating like crazy. In last 60 days, I wrote 60 original articles—not recycled, not templated. Just idea after idea, each refined my approach through rapid cycles.

Want to do the same? Try this:

• Move faster. Write something basic and build on it.

• Don’t over-read. AI outputs aren’t final drafts. Skim them, pull what’s good, and keep going.

• Reflect. After 3–5 iterations, stop and ask: What’s improving? What’s not?

• Keep a prompt journal. Save the ones that worked. Not because they’re perfect—because they worked for you.

This shift—from chasing perfection to chasing momentum—made all the difference for me. I’d prompt, skim, tweak, re-prompt. Within a few cycles, I had something solid.

And those 60 articles? They’re the result.

You don’t need wealth to work like this. ChatGPT is affordable. The real barrier is the fear of wasting effort. Rich people iterate without that fear. You can, too.

The moment you stop chasing the “perfect prompt” and start experimenting without shame—that’s when AI becomes useful. That’s when it stops being a gimmick and becomes a tool for actual progress.

Try it. No magic. Just fast, fearless iteration. One tweak at a time.

---

Follow up article